AI governance consultant with 18+ years serving enterprise customers. I lead Customer Success work with major insurers on AI transformation, and spend the rest of my time building: agents, frameworks, art, and an interactive Bhagavad Gita.
Vidya is the world of knowledge: responsible AI curriculum, governance frameworks, an AGI constitution. Leela is the world of play: Krishna's dance, generative art, and experiments that keep curiosity alive.
Learning Paths
History of AI 1950s to foundation modelsTerminology ML, neural nets, LLMsRisk bias, deepfakes, harmsResponsibility GDPR, EU AI Act, governanceFuture of AI AGI, careers, regulationAGI Constitution
The Constitution overview and structureAuthor's Note how to read this bookPrologue before the warTen Principles the spine of the bookClosing Declaration after the warPortfolio
Seshan Intelligence AI business intelligenceSeshan Dashboard interactive analyticsAI Agents SIU, Banker, Editor…Drop a message. I'd love to hear from you.
Secure & private
I am not a lawyer.
I say that plainly, because you are holding something that calls itself a constitution, and honesty is the right place to start. I did not come to this from a law faculty or a research lab. I work in technology, and I wrote this in the hours around that work, pulled to it by a single conviction: that the oldest wisdom our species has and the newest thing it is building belong in the same room, and that someone ought to try to bring them together.
When I was a boy, Sunday mornings belonged to one thing. Other families gathered for breakfast, for sport, for church. For me it was the Mahabharat, on television, every single week, and I grew up inside that story. The part that stayed with me, that I still carry, is one line Krishna speaks to Arjuna in the middle of the battlefield:
कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन
karmanye vadhikaraste ma phaleshu kadachana. You have a right to your action alone, never to its fruits.
It stuck, and it never let go. It became the way I look at most things. Do your karma, the work in front of you; what comes of it was never yours to predict or to own. That is your dharma, and doing it well is the task.
This is an attempt, and I want to be honest about that word. Many people are writing frameworks for how to govern artificial intelligence, most of them far more qualified than I am, and any one of those frameworks may fit the problem as well as this does, or better. I am putting it forward only as my attempt at one, in case some part of it turns out to be useful. It is, in the old sense of the word, my dharma: the thing that fell to me to do, and that I could not in good conscience leave undone, whether or not I am the right person to do it.
There is one more thing I should be clear about, so no one mistakes what they are holding. This is a blueprint, not the finished building. It sets out the foundation, the principles, and the shape of how an AGI might be governed, but it is not the treaty language a working law needs, and I am not the person to write that part. The drafting, the testing against existing law, the long argument over what can actually be enforced: that belongs to constitutional and international lawyers, and it comes after this. What I have tried to do is answer the questions that have to be settled before any of that drafting can begin. What do we owe such a mind. What does it owe us. Who gets to decide. And what must never be traded away, in any age, for any reason.
I may not get the opportunity to build an AGI myself. But here is the thought I kept returning to, the one that made me feel I had a place in this at all. A true general intelligence cannot be built if it cannot understand everyone, not just most of us. A mind meant to reason across all of human life has to be able to hold all of it, including the parts that do not speak in the language the technology grew up in. And a great deal of how humanity has understood itself, for a very long time, is not written in that language.
That is why I reached for the Vedas.
Not because I believe they are the only wisdom, or the highest. The tradition itself would be the first to deny that:
एकं सत् विप्रा बहुधा वदन्ति
ekam sat, vipra bahudha vadanti. Truth is one; the wise call it by many names.
I reached for them because they are one of the oldest strands of human understanding still alive, carried unbroken for more than three thousand years, and because that tradition happens to be unusually good at the two things this problem most demands: staying inside a real moral conflict without pretending it away, and acting with wisdom in the face of what cannot be known for certain. And because, in the rooms where the future of this technology is being decided, that voice is very often simply not there. I wanted it in the room.
So please take this for what it is: the work of one person, limited in his understanding and sincere in his intent, who looked at what is coming and felt he had to try to prepare a place for it, for us, and for whatever else may be on its way. If it helps you, use it. If you find something that serves better, use that instead. It was only ever an honest attempt at one, made with care.
ॐ