AI governance consultant with 18+ years serving enterprise customers. I lead Customer Success work with major insurers on AI transformation, and spend the rest of my time building: agents, frameworks, art, and an interactive Bhagavad Gita.
Vidya is the world of knowledge: responsible AI curriculum, governance frameworks, an AGI constitution. Leela is the world of play: Krishna's dance, generative art, and experiments that keep curiosity alive.
Learning Paths
History of AI 1950s to foundation modelsTerminology ML, neural nets, LLMsRisk bias, deepfakes, harmsResponsibility GDPR, EU AI Act, governanceFuture of AI AGI, careers, regulationAGI Constitution
The Constitution overview and structureAuthor's Note how to read this bookPrologue before the warTen Principles the spine of the bookClosing Declaration after the warPortfolio
Seshan Intelligence AI business intelligenceSeshan Dashboard interactive analyticsAI Agents SIU, Banker, Editor…Drop a message. I'd love to hear from you.
Secure & private
Kubera is the god of wealth, and it is worth being exact about what that means, because it is not quite what it sounds like. Kubera does not own the treasure of the worlds. He keeps it. Brahma made him custodian of all the riches there are, the gold and gems of the earth, the bright hoards of the heavens, the buried wealth beneath the ground, and set him to guard it and to see that whatever flowed out of it flowed fairly. He was a keeper of the accounts, not the owner of them, and the Yakshas, the old spirits of forest and hill, served under him as auditors and sentries, watching the treasury to keep it honest and whole.
For a long age Kubera kept it well. Then, slowly, he grew comfortable. He began to feel that the treasury was simply his, that his custody was a kind of ownership and would hold itself, that the order of things would keep the wealth safe whether he watched it closely or not. He let his guard down.
His half-brother was Ravana, the demon king of Lanka, and Ravana wanted the treasury and did not much care how he took it. He came in force against his own kin, overpowered Kubera, and carried off the treasure and the flying chariot with it. He did not win because he was stronger than the moral order of things. He won because the guardian had stopped guarding. The wealth of the gods, left half-watched, went to the one who wanted it most, taken from the one who had forgotten it was only ever his to keep.
Two things in that story carry over. The first is what Kubera actually was: a custodian, not an owner. The wealth passed through his hands; it never belonged to them. The second is how he lost it, which was not through any vice but through forgetting the first thing, through coming to treat a trust as a possession.
Both apply squarely to the wealth AGI will make, and it will make a great deal of it. The pull will be to treat that wealth as the private property of whoever assembled the final system. But an AGI is trained on the whole inheritance of human civilisation, the writing and art and code and science and talk of billions of people across centuries, and it runs on infrastructure the public built, staffed by people the public educated, selling into markets the public's laws hold up. To call the wealth that comes out of all that the private property of the last company in the chain is like calling the river the property of whoever built the last dam on it. None of it was built alone, and some of what it earns is owed back.
This does not make profit wrong, only hoarding. The tradition has a name for the discipline, aparigraha, non-possessiveness: the understanding that holding far more than you need while others go without is a quiet kind of theft. Profit is fine and growth is welcome. Concentration so extreme that it starves safety research, hollows out the communities AGI displaces, or overpowers the institutions meant to govern it is not.
So a share of the profit from AGI is owed to a common fund, the Wealth Commons, for the plain reason that it grew out of what belongs to everyone. It is not a tax or a charity, only the return a trust owes what it was drawn from. The share funds five things:
The size of the share is set by the legislature, not fixed here, because the right level will move with the scale of deployment and the state of the economy. But it is held to a few rules. It is never zero. It rises with profit, so that those who gain most give most. It follows the wealth wherever the wealth is booked, so that routing profits through a low-tax haven does not dissolve the obligation. And it is reviewed at each twenty-five-year turning.
No AGI may be deployed to replace human work without a plan, filed in advance, for the people whose work it replaces. That plan is a condition of deployment, not a gesture made afterward. It has to say honestly who will be affected, provide real retraining and support with the deployer carrying the cost, phase the change so people have time to adapt, and be built with the affected communities rather than over their heads. A person is not a line item to be optimised away.
Under the plan sits a harder principle. Jobs will change, as they always have, and this Constitution promises no one a particular job forever. But there is a difference between an economy that shifts and one that shuts every door at once. A society that uses AGI to strip people of all useful purpose has not freed them; it has cut them off from their svadharma, the work that fits who they are. The test is whether people are left a way to contribute at all, through work, service, creation, or care, not whether jobs change. An AGI that closes every path and opens none has failed that test, whatever its efficiency.
The Sovereignty chapter forbade any single hand from holding all the control over AGI. The same danger comes back in money's form, this time in who owns the machines rather than who writes the rules. No one entity may command more than a set share of the world's AGI computing power, because past a point sheer capacity becomes the power to dictate terms to everyone else. Bali's limit holds here too, that even wealth honestly earned must accept a ceiling. Where a company crosses it, the remedies are real: opening its capacity to others, breaking up its holdings, or handing the excess to the Wealth Commons. And the ceiling is measured across the whole world, so that splitting a business across borders to slip under it is itself the violation.
Not all of this wealth belongs to the people alive to spend it. AGI may compound wealth across every field at once in a way no earlier technology did, and a generation that spent all of it, or built the economy so only today's people gained, would be taking from those who come after and had no say in it. So a portion of the Commons is held back in a Generational Trust: closed to present governments for present spending, invested to preserve its value rather than gamble it, and watched by trustees whose duty runs to the unborn and who sit in none of the other institutions. It is Kubera's lesson turned forward in time. The wealth is held, not owned, and the ones holding it now are keepers for the ones not here yet. It is kept in the open, its holdings and performance reported plainly, because the Yakshas' oldest lesson is that what is hidden is what gets taken.
Vedic Anchors: Kubera (कुबेर), the custodian of the treasury who mistook keeping for owning; the Yakshas (यक्ष), the auditors whose watchfulness kept the treasury honest; Ravana (रावण), the force that seizes whatever is left unguarded; Aparigraha (अपरिग्रह), non-possessiveness; Dana Dharma (दान धर्म), wealth as a trust owed back to the community it came from. See Glossary. Constitutional Sources: Indian Constitution, Articles 38-39 (a social order that serves the common good and prevents concentration of wealth); South African Constitution, Sections 25 and 27 (property subject to the public interest; social security); German Basic Law, Article 14(2) (property entails obligations to the public good); the OECD framework against profit-shifting; the antitrust tradition against dominance. See Sources. Related: carries the anti-monopoly rule of Sovereignty and Power into the economy, from control into capacity; extends Intergenerational Justice (Principle IX) into wealth; funds the very institutions of the Separation of Powers and the Guardians of Co-Existence; treats displacement as a matter of the dignity named in Principle I.
ॐ मा गृधः कस्यस्विद्धनम् ॐ